How should an RME handle potential conflicts of interest?

• A. Disclose, recuse from decision-making when necessary, and document safeguards to protect client and public interests.
• B. Ignore conflicts to avoid delaying projects.
• C. Delegate the decision to a colleague.
• D. Publicly disclose only after a negative outcome.

Answer: (A)

Handling potential conflicts of interest relies on openness and protective steps that keep decisions fair and trustworthy. The best approach is to disclose the conflict promptly, recuse from decision-making when impartiality is compromised, and document safeguards designed to protect both client and public interests. Disclosure makes the conflict transparent to stakeholders, recusal prevents biased influence in important choices, and documenting safeguards—such as independent reviews, oversight mechanisms, and clear decision records—creates accountability and helps ensure actions remain aligned with ethical obligations. Together, these practices maintain integrity, protect those served, and preserve public trust in the process.

Ignoring conflicts undermines trust and can harm clients or the public. Delegating the decision to a colleague does not remove the bias or the risk of biased outcomes. Public disclosure only after a negative outcome is reactive and fails to prevent potential harm or appearance of impropriety.